Attached is the FLRA’s denial of the agency’s exceptions to a decision rendered by Arbitrator Landau in Alaska that determined that the fuel related to the use of a rental car in Ok City is reimbursable and defined the proper way of calculating the constructive cost under art 27, sec 3. Prior to this decision, the FAA recognized its responsibility to pay employees for fuel. Joan has been assisting (doing all the work) in identifying all of our outstanding grievances related to this issue and I have been working with FAA HQ (painfully) in remedying each grievance.
However, before this decision, the FAA was reluctant to adhere to the arbitrator’s decision as it related to the constructive cost analysis. This decision should clear up any apprehensions. In summation, the constructive cost under this part of the CBA is based on the difference between flying and driving from the designated point of entry (as defined in the article) to Ok City. The agency typically and incorrectly considers the flight from the work location (Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico) rather than from the point of entry. Under the agency’s scheme, employees were left with less money to apply toward the use of a rental car.
We have many grievances related to both of these issues and it will take some time to resolve them all. I will keep you apprised, any questions let me know.
Download Flra decision rental car gasoline
Dennie Rose
PASS Assistant Counsel
1150 17th Street, NW, Suite 702
Washington, DC 20036
202-293-7277